FAE PUBLICATION ON PANTAMIGATE: COLOSSAL REDUCTION OF TRUST, A PERCEPTIVE ABUSE OF GREY HAIR AND DISLOCATION OF AUTHORITY – MISCARRIAGE OF WISDOM INTENSELY NEEDED 2

 Series 2

Continued from Series 1

Who are these elders, are they the same people we nourish and flourish on their good counsel for common good of all?

Hope they didn’t acquire certificate from FUTO in as well as allocating a space for befitting secretariat of the alumni sequencing as such or were they afraid due to the tone of the VC’s address! how come no single admonition or establishment of what the institution’s prayer is before the court?

How can they, in their wisdom gather to raise fund to support the accused VC into legally pressuring on ASUU to accept her decisions publicly questioned by several interest groups - without making their positions known to the management, being that academics (ASUU) who considered the decision short of quality has extended threat sanctions to our dearest alma matter.

How be it that, despite being labelled nonentities for requesting explanation through FAA (which they ascent membership) from the university management on the level involvement in the media Fraudster allegation of the media about our beloved institution, the elders finished their meal in peace without mentioning this? Even when the leadership of the NEC revolted against dinning with persons who labelled them nonentities in anger without addressing the issues of concern, (though unhealthy decision, but expected of a young blood, hence pardonable) but how do we stare to pardon the I don’t care feedback of the elders on such baptism that stemmed a mother child revolt, followed by a media publication of dissociation of FAA position on PANTAMIGATE, does it mean they are in full approval of the recent developments?

What moral sanctity is behind the decisions of these elders, to face the public and claim that they are members of FAA whom the management has labelled as NONENTITIES - in response to the communique sent to them, seeking explanation on their involvement with the social media downsizing of the University, yet made no question to the management on such a crucial dinner?

In their wisdom, all they think as a befitting response to that new baptismal certificate issued to the alumni, is hosting the said management for a dinner as elders? Raising fund for them in the face of legal propositions, without caution that it could be perceived a ploy, cum support aimed at forcing ASUU to accept or upturn her stance through a court process before the public. – To further stoke suspicions, no effort was made to ask the management when it started producing nonentities as alumni graduates?

To be continued in series 3

Yours always,

Concerned FUTO Alumnus